The Myth of Conflict Between Science and Religion Essay

The Myth of Conflict Between Science and Religion - Essay ExampleConflict seems to be the most common interaction between devotion and science. The two seem to action on nearly everything including conclusions such as the origin of man, the origin of diseases, and heliocentric solar system, as swell up as on how they arrive at their respective conclusions (Brooke and Numbers, 2011). Their conflict seem to emanate from what they rely on for their respective beliefs religion relies on authority of marvellous being and truth that is supposed to be eternal and universal, while science relies on authority whose source is reasoning and evidence that are subject to challenge. It is this genius of conflict that informs the assertion by Ronald Numbers that the greatest myth in the history of religion and science holds that they have been in a constant conflict state (Numbers, 2009). There has been a raging debate regarding this assertion, with some agreeing with it, while others disagre eing. This essay bequeath discuss how the history of religion and science has been in a state of constant conflict as argued by Ronald Numbers. The argument will be supported through a discussion of atomic number 7, Einstein, and Darwin. The brilliant work of Isaac due north in the seventeenth century gave rise to issues that strained the relationship between religion and science at that time and in subsequent years (Harrison, 2010). Newtons arguments have been used by many scientists in their works and have been some of the greatest causes of the conflict between science and religion. Newton pattern the celestial bodies (the sun, earth, and moon) behavior through means that are largely mechanical by posting that the gist of gravity was the only force responsible for unremarkable phenomena (Newton, 1953). His model postulated that terrestrial phenomena like the falling of heavy bodies to earth and celestial phenomena like the orbit of the earth around the sun was as a conduce of the force of gravity. He brilliantly combined his observation with mathematical model to formulate three famous motion laws that a force of strength utilize to a mass body leads to acceleration that every action is paired with an opposite and equal reaction and that a body at rest will always stay at rest, while a body in motion will keep being in uniform motion, unless an external force acts on it (Newton, 1953). The powerful and comprehensive work of Newton significantly contributed to the field of science as his principles account for a number of natural phenomena. Although he often argued that in the absence of a materially-mediated force, immortal might be directly responsible for gravitational force, he never categorically stated that the system of record required God (Brooke and Numbers, 2011). His success and continued success in the field of success is viewed by many scientists as an argument for atheism. According to most of them, no one has any reason to believe t hat God exists, if God is not needed to explain the worlds behavior since mechanical and scientific principles can. However, ghostlike arguments conflicts the science arguments as postulated by Newton (Morris, 1974). Contrary to Newtons arguments, religion holds that God exists and he is the force behind everything including the terrestrial and celestial phenomena. Also, religion is of the view that the behavior of the world in the past and in present times can only be understood by inferring to a imperious Being and not science. Besides, religion conflicts Newtons arguments by arguing that the worlds complexity spoke in favor of the existence of God